Oh, I dunno. Maier. Vivien. It's all too good to be true. The epic scale of that unacknowledged commitment, the failures of impoverishment, lovelessness and an inconsequential passing. Who doesn't have reservations? As for the two men who did make money maybe they deserved it having recognised, salvaged and successfully hyper-promoted someone whose images were destined for landfill otherwise, someone whose name and memory were dispersing like smoke on a windy day. MoMA, Steidl or collectordaily couldn't have done a fraction as much. A lot of photographers find the whole thing a bit too Sunday-supplement- ish . And she made photographs in the street, ffs. Even the BBC have squeezed her story into their arts programming at least twice despite their interest in photography normally being minus five on the Celsius scale, which is not quite below that of the Tate a decade or two ago but even so. From what is claimed, she was self-centred and covetous of her images, spending her ...