collectordaily review
Loring at collectordaily, as always, make a case for work that could be lazily dismissed out of hand (as I'm wont to do when flicking through the gallery shots at the top of each review). But I have to admit there is a quality to these images that makes them very different from a random silhouette. That became obvious today when coming across a very similar image, (uncredited, presumably stock) used in a BBC online article and although sharing most key elements it's completely lacking the powerfulness of Deeman's photographs.
Loring at collectordaily, as always, make a case for work that could be lazily dismissed out of hand (as I'm wont to do when flicking through the gallery shots at the top of each review). But I have to admit there is a quality to these images that makes them very different from a random silhouette. That became obvious today when coming across a very similar image, (uncredited, presumably stock) used in a BBC online article and although sharing most key elements it's completely lacking the powerfulness of Deeman's photographs.
